Another Nail in the Board

The days of immobilizing anyone with any mechanism that might possibly cause a spinal injury are coming to an end. I’m not just talking about the standard selective spinal immobilization guidelines that have been spreading across the country over the last ten years, including the BLS level. I am talking about spinal immobilization boards being used for nothing other than to aid in moving patients.

Progress is slow, but lately, this engine has gathered mighty steam. Rogue Medic in The Slow, Agonizing Death of Conventional Spinal Immobilization recently reported that members of the National Association of Emergency Medical Services Physicians were circulating the following draft statement for the larger group’s consideration:

The National Association of EMS Physicians believes that:

There is no demonstrated outcome benefit of maintaining rigid spinal immobilization with a long backboard during EMS transport of a trauma patient.

The long backboard can induce respiratory compromise, patient agitation and additional pain. Further, the backboard can decrease tissue perfusion at pressure points, leading to the development of pressure sores.

A long backboard or similar device may be useful to facilitate spinal precautions during patient extrication.
Patient time on long backboards should be minimized.

Securing a trauma patient to an EMS stretcher without a long backboard whether or not a cervical collar is being used is acceptable for maintaining spinal precaution during transport.

Implementation of protocols that deemphasize the use of the long backboard should involve all affected partners in the EMS system.

NAEMPS recently held their annual meeting. I don’t know if they formally addressed the issue, but their Facebook page mentions that a study on the biomechanics of spinal immobilization won the prize for best scientific presentation. The bottom line of the study, (BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF SPINAL IMMOBILIZATION DURING PREHOSPITAL EXTRICATION: A PROOF-OF-CONCEPT STUDY by Mark Dixon, Joseph O’Halloran, Niamh Cummins, University College Dublin) “Standard extrication techniques cause up to four times more cervical spine movement during extrication than controlled self-extrication.” The presentation evidently received a standing ovation.

In Prehospital spine immobilization for penetrating trauma–review and recommendations from the the Prehospital Trauma Life Support Executive Committee, published in the Journal of Trauma in 2011, the authors recommended the following:

• There are no data to support routine spine immobilization in patients with penetrating trauma to the neck or torso.

• There are no data to support routine spine immobilization in patients with isolated penetrating trauma to the cranium.

• Spine immobilization should never be done at the expense of accurate physical examination or identification and correction of life-threatening conditions in patients with penetrating trauma.

• Spinal immobilization may be performed after penetrating injury when a focal neurologic deficit is noted on physical examination although there is little evidence of benefit even in these cases.

Mark Hauswald the author of the startling 1998 study that showed that unimmobilized spinal patients in Malaysia did better than the immobilized spinal patients in New Mexico, recently published an outstanding article in the September 2012 Emergency Medical Journal called A re-conceptualisation of acute spinal care.

He writes: “There is little scientific support for many of the recommended interventions and there is evidence that at least some methods now used in the field are harmful. Specific treatments that are irrational and which can be safely discarded include the use of:

Backboards for transportation

Cervical collar use except in specific injury types

Immobilization of ambulatory patients on backboards

Prolonged attempts to stabilize the spine during extrication

Mechanical immobilization of uncooperative or seizing patients

Forceful in line stabilization during airway management.”

In our state, the Yale New Haven Sponsor Hospital Program recently released the following statement for their sponsored EMS services:

“Effective immediately, long backboards will no longer be utilized for spinal immobilization of ambulatory patients. Patient who are ambulatory at the scene, but who require cervical immobilization based on our selective spinal immobilization protocol, will be placed in the position of comfort, limiting movement of the neck during the process. This change in procedure is the first step toward eventually using long boards only when needed to facilitate extrication, and not during transport.”

Our region is considering draft language to limit the use of long boards for ambulatory patients, patients with penetrating trauma and patients during interfacility transport, as well as to remind paramedics that the goal is to limit force against the neck. Patients who are agitated, seizing, or have difficulty breathing should not be forced onto a long back board to protect against the theoretical possibility of a spine injury.

This is a huge change for EMS, but we should all welcome it. Spinal immobilization was a concept instituted in the belief that it might prevent rare spinal injuries from growing worse. There was never any solid evidence to support it, and now more and more evidence is piling up that the practice is not only uncomfortable for patients, but harmful.


  • MedicJoe says:

    They changed out protocols in the NH county south of you, omitting the long board for ambulatory patients.

  • In Eastern Canada we use the Canadian C-Spine Rule for field clearance in most provinces, but there are still lots of instances of patients ending up on long backboards inappropriately. At our last provincial EMS conference in Newfoundland there was a case report of an adolescent female being left on a board for days by a hospital because of an issue transferring her to a higher level of care. Apparently she ended up with pressure ulcers because of it.

    Ultimately, I think even spine-injured patients deserve something better engineered and more comfortable than the plastic slabs we have now. Let’s hope those things go the way of MAST pants soon. . .


  • mike short says:

    why not revert to the scoop no movement no rolling on or off ,how can aplastic plank immobilise????/scoop holds body in a small depression and totally can immobilise.

  • CJ says:

    We do have something better for spinalized patients: vacuum splints. I don’t know if there are any studies demonstrating efficacy of those, either.

    As for MAST pants- they do have their place. Anyone who’s had to manage pelvic fractures or complex leg fractures (such as vehicle vs pedestrian) can attest to that.

3 Trackbacks

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

background image Blogger Img

Peter Canning

JEMS Talk: Google Hangout

Recent Posts
copy-medicscribeheader.png Changes September 29, 2015
medicscribeheader.png Surprises September 17, 2015
The Finger August 26, 2015
medicscribeheaderbg Assembly Line August 24, 2015
copy-medicscribeheader.png Patient Follow-up June 21, 2015
  • ems-health-safety (7)
  • ems-topics (712)
  • hazmat (1)
  • Uncategorized (426)
  • Archives
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • May 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • Comments
    Thanks for the advice, love your books by the way!
    2015-09-27 04:04:59
    Keep your eyes open and your mouth shut unless you have something to say. Be nice to everyone, especially your patients. Keep showing up.
    2015-09-27 00:55:46
    The 6 Rs – The Right Drug
    You are right. I wrote the post so long ago, it is hard to remember. Perhaps I meant to write salicylates. Who knows. Good catch.
    2015-09-27 00:54:32
    The 6 Rs – The Right Drug
    ASA is not an NSAID.
    2015-09-24 12:50:52
    Hey PC, do you have any solid advice for someone new to EMS?
    2015-09-18 23:27:32

    Now Available: Mortal Men

    Order My Books


    FireEMS Blogs eNewsletter

    Sign-up to receive our free monthly eNewsletter