Five Days at Memorial

In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in 2005, I was deployed to Gulfport, Mississippi for a week to assist with 911 operations. I witnessed firsthand the destruction caused by the storm, and witnessed the great resilience of the Gulf Coast people. Most of the news coverage at the time focused on the flooding of New Orleans. I remember reading subsequently that a doctor and some nurses in a New Orleans hospital were charged with murder in hastening the deaths of some infirm patients who were unable to be evacuated. I remember being outraged by the gall to charge health care providers who were no doubt doing their best under extraordinary circumstances, and I remember being glad to hear the charges were subsequently, dropped.

With this background in mind, I was interested to read a new book Five Days at Memorial: Life and Death in a Storm-Ravaged Hospital, an account of what happened at Memorial Hospital during Hurricane Katrina and its aftermath. The New York Times selected the book as one of the ten best of the year.

I was greatly disturbed by what I read.

First off, let me say, I have always tried to hold to the creed of “You canít judge another paramedic or health care provider unless you were there.Ē So many times I have heard stories that caused me to react one way, but then on hearing the real story, I was able understand a providerís actions. Now that I am an EMS coordinator, responsible with overseeing care, I find myself having at times to judge without being there. I try to get as much firsthand information as possible, and I find myself giving people wide latitude unless the failures are too great.

Thus in this book, we are left in the authorís hands, and the author was not there, but that said, her book is exhaustive, and she spoke at length, it seems, to a great many people who were there.

This is her take on what happened. A hospital was flooded. Electricity was lost. The heat rose. There was fear of marauders in the streets. There was no clear disaster plan. Communications with the outside world were disjointed. The decision was made to evacuate the sickest people last. At some point in time on the fifth day, someone decided rather than putting the sickest through the ordeal of evacuation, they would instead give them lethal doses of morphine and midazolam to ease their suffering. This was done without consultation with them or their families. Quite a large number of patients died within a few hours, on the fifth day when evacuations were still going on and capable of going on for some time. The patients were later found to have excessive amounts of these drugs in their bodies inconsistent with their prior treatment plans. At least one of these patients, an extremely obese paraplegic, had been up until that time alert, oriented, and without a terminal disease.

Some other allegations from the book include: patients were turned away from the hospital while the staff membersí pets were being cared for, there was amble food and water, parts of the building had electricity while in other parts peopleís ventilators were turned off, patients suffered dehydration because when the electricity died , their IV pumps didnít work, and no one thought to use gravity and run drips by hand (eventually someone thought of this on one of the floors, but not throughout the hospital. The hospital stopped being a hospital and went into what they called ďSurvival Mode.Ē

While only one doctor was charged, the author suggests the more than one doctor participated. What is not clear is whose idea it was. Clearly, it was never discussed in an open forum. The authorís conclusion is not only should it not have been done, it was not necessary. Many of these patients, she argues, would have survived. There was food, there was water, and there were means of evacuation.

I believe when an individual provider fails, the error is not just an individual error but a system error. Here individuals failed because the system failed them. And the individuals at Memorial, unlike those at another hospital, were unable to adjust their systems on the fly.

In the aftermath, the fall guys were (as is often typical) the individual providers who the system failed by not providing them with better plans or guidance. Providers were charged with crimes. The people who had botched the disaster preparationsóthe state, city, and hospital administrators– were not. In the end, understandably perhaps, no one had the stomach to prosecute the health care providers and charges, despite the evidence, were dropped.

I found this book disturbing mainly because the decision to euthanize lacked a sound ethical basis. The decisions had a paternalistic arrogance that these deciders knew best and thus they made decisions which were not theirs to make in secret.

In contrast, the author points out, another New Orleans hospital undergoing similar conditions was able to evacuate their sickest patients without the same loss of life, and they never stopped caring for their patients. They insisted their staff rest and work as much on regular schedule as possible. They came up with creative approaches and kept everyone’s morale high.

As a practicing paramedic, a reaffirming lesson for me in this book is when it comes to the life and death decisions we have to make, never hesitate but to act in the patientís best interest, and never be afraid to confer with others. 500 pound patient on the 4th floor in cardiac arrest? Treat them no different than a 100 pound patient in cardiac arrest. If they meet the criteria to continue working, work them as if they are your family member. If the call has reached the point of futility, establish consensus with your fellow providers. Our guidelines require any cessation of termination require the agreement of all paramedics on scene, not just the most senior.

I am all for comfort measures for terminal patients, but lacking proper ethical process, hastening another’s death, is not what we should ever be about.

1 Comment

  • CJ Ewell says:

    I also read this book. I highly recommend it to anyone involved in disaster planning. After reading this, I believe that disaster planning should be required as a condition of receiving Medicare/Medicaid funding and should be thoroughly evaluated against established standards. That being said, it also ultimately falls to each individual to act in the best interest of patiens in a disaster. It is right that those individuals were charged. It is a shame that they were not convicted.
    I also believe that much could be learned from the lone hospital that did continue to function. There is probably a book’s worth of information to be had there. I really wish someone would write that one.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

background image Blogger Img

Peter Canning

JEMS Talk: Google Hangout

Recent Posts
ECG Quiz May 7, 2015
copy-medicscribeheader.png Intranasal Medication April 26, 2015
SW_Rectangle The Jug March 26, 2015
SW_Rectangle The Ideal Medic March 24, 2015
Categories
  • ems-health-safety (7)
  • ems-topics (705)
  • hazmat (1)
  • Uncategorized (421)
  • Archives
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • May 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • Comments
    Casey
    Intranasal Medication
    Agreed Steve. Love IN Versed for combative/ictal patients. Also IN versed is used in ED for kids. Helps with pain relief and as an amnesic and wears off fairly quick- not sure that directly applies to prehospital but food for thought nonetheless
    2015-05-07 00:36:28
    Chris
    AHA 2015 Guidelines: A Preview
    I am a 25 year veteran firefighter/medic, and 9 year veteran critial care fixed wing medic. I work in Northeast Ohio. In this region, we have all but abandoned endotrachal intubation for the intent of ease of a superglottic airway. AHA de-emphasizing ETI and we have seen this coming for a while. We either bag…
    2015-05-05 20:54:08
    Steve
    Intranasal Medication
    "either because they are seizing or are violent, then the better and quicker route would be IM. " I'm quite hesitant about bring a needle against someone fighting me or shaking... those are the perfect times to be needleless.
    2015-04-27 18:34:14
    bill
    The Ideal Medic
    very well put! aggression can be a good in moderation but over aggression can do harm. 1 year to 30 years no medic will know it all epically with our ever changing job description. thank you for your input!
    2015-04-26 11:46:50
    Ben Leighton
    Adenosine
    Hi. Im a UK Student Paramedic and I have a few questions regarding adenosine (we currently dont carry it) and I was wondering if any of you guys could e-mail me at ben-leighton@hotmail.co.uk and start some correspondance. Im aiming to set a proposal to my service in order to carry this drug and wanted some…
    2015-04-20 13:36:03

    Now Available: Mortal Men

    Mortal Men is available as an electronic book for Kindle, Nook or any other e-reader. Here is a link to some of the places to buy it. The book sells for $3.99. Barnes and Noble Amazon Smashwords Scribd Also Available from iBooks

    Order My Books

    Support EMS Bloggers, Buy Their Books

    Google

    Order Books and Movies

    FireEMS Blogs eNewsletter

    Sign-up to receive our free monthly eNewsletter

    LATEST EMS NEWS

    HOT FORUM DISCUSSIONS